Differential pattern of CCR1 internalization in human eosinophils: prolonged internalization by CCL5 in contrast to CCL3.

BACKGROUND: Whereas recent studies underlie the fundamental importance of the CC chemokine receptor 3 (CCR3) for the recruitment of eosinophils in allergic diseases, controversial data exist about the relevance of CCR1 on eosinophils. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the expression and regulation of CCR1 on eosinophils. METHODS: Flow cytometric analysis of whole blood eosinophils and CD16-negative selected eosinophils from healthy nonatopic donors and from patients with atopic disorders was performed and CCR1 receptor internalization and re-expression were studied. RESULTS: Flow cytometric analysis of whole blood eosinophils revealed that 17.8% of the donors expressed high levels of CCR1 (CCR1high) and 82.2% low levels of CCR1 (CCR1low). A significant down-regulation of CCR1 was induced by 24 h preincubation of isolated eosinophils from CCR1high donors either with IL-3, CC chemokine ligand 3 (CCL3), CCL5, CCL7, or CCL13. Internalization experiments using eosinophils from CCR1high donors revealed that CCL5 is more effective to induce CCR1 internalization than CCL3. Whereas CCR1 re-expression after stimulation with CCL3 reached prestimulation levels (120 min: 81.3% relative CCR1 surface expression) CCL5 induced a prolonged CCR1 internalization (120 min: 15.7%). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a distinct pattern of CCR1 internalization and re-expression in human eosinophils between CCL3 and CCL5, as CCL5 induces a prolonged CCR1 internalization and the basic value is not reached after 24 h. Since prolonged receptor internalization plays a central role in chemokine-mediated inhibition of receptor function, CCR1 seems to be an attractive target on human eosinophils for chemokine receptor blockade besides CCR3.

T-helper 2 cytokines attenuate senescent eosinophil activation by the CXCR4 ligand stromal-derived factor-1alpha (CXCL12).

BACKGROUND: Different chemokine receptors have been suggested to play a pivotal role in allergic diseases and therefore to be relevant for the activation of effector cells and propagation of the inflammatory response. The CXC chemokine receptor CXCR4 has recently been found on the surface of eosinophils implicating a role in allergic diseases. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the functional expression of CXCR4 on senescent eosinophils. Moreover, we questioned whether the cytokine profile--T-helper (Th)1 and Th2 cytokines--affect the activation of eosinophils via the CXCR4 that could be important for the different phases of the allergic reaction. METHODS: CXCR4 expression on human eosinophils was analysed by flow cytometry and RT-PCR. Functional analyses of intracellular calcium fluxes, actin polymerization, release of reactive oxygen species and, chemotaxis were carried out using spectrofluorometry, flow cytometry, chemiluminescence and modified Boyden chamber technique. RESULTS: Whole blood and freshly isolated eosinophils weakly express CXCR4 surface protein. Incubation in culture medium without addition of cytokines for 24 h always lead to strong CXCR4 surface expression that paralleled with stromal-derived factor-1alpha (CXCL12)-induced eosinophil activation. Stimulation of eosinophils with CXCL12 leads to an internalization of CXCR4, which could be prevented by phenylarsine oxide. Co-incubation of eosinophils with Th2 cytokines such as IL-3, IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, and granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor prevented the expression of CXCR4 and affected eosinophil activation after stimulation with the CXCR4 ligand CXCL12. From these cytokines, IL-3 was the only cytokine completely inhibited intracellular calcium fluxes and chemotaxis of eosinophils in response to CXCL12. CONCLUSION: Senescent eosinophils express functional CXCR4 receptors, which are prevented by Th2 cytokines that are found in the early phase of allergic reaction. Therefore, CXCR4 activation of eosinophils seems to be important in the chronic phase of allergic reaction, which is dominated by a Th1 cytokine profile.

IL-3 induces down-regulation of CCR3 protein and mRNA in human eosinophils.

Cytokines and chemokines are responsible for the attraction and activation of eosinophils in allergic and inflammatory diseases. Whereas cytokines such as IL-3, IL-5, and GM-CSF activate eosinophils via heterodimeric receptors containing a distinct alpha-chain (binding domain) and a common beta-chain (signaling domain), chemokines such as eotaxin activate eosinophils via seven-transmembrane G(i) protein-coupled CCRs. Recent studies have demonstrated the importance of CCR3 on human eosinophils that undergo receptor recycling after chemokine activation, but the modulation of this receptor by cytokines has not yet been addressed. In this study, we demonstrate that IL-3 induces a dose- and time-dependent down-regulation of CCR3 from the surface of human eosinophils comparable to the CCR3-specific ligand eotaxin, whereas IL-5, GM-CSF, IL-4, IL-10, IL-13, IFN-gamma, and TNF-alpha had no effect. Maximal down-regulation of CCR3 in response to IL-3 was reached at 24 h. Reduction of CCR3 surface protein in response to IL-3 could be prevented by an anti-IL-3 mAb and was neither due to the release of CC chemokines nor to nonspecific binding of IL-3 to CCR3. Moreover, down-regulation was prevented by phenylarsine oxide, a nonspecific inhibitor of receptor internalization. After 24 h, IL-3-induced decrease of CCR3 surface expression correlated with diminished mRNA expression, suggesting a transcriptional regulation mechanism. Since wortmannin partially inhibited IL-3- but not eotaxin-induced CCR3 down-regulation, receptor down-modulation seems to underlie different signaling events. Therefore, these data suggest a novel role for the cytokine IL-3 in the activation process of eosinophils and its predominant chemokine receptor CCR3.

Aminooxypentane-RANTES induces CCR3 activation and internalization of CCR3 from the surface of human eosinophils.

Eosinophils are predominant effector cells in allergic diseases attracted by several CC chemokines into the inflammatory tissue. According to their important role in attracting leukocytes, several kinds of chemokine receptor antagonists have been developed. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of aminooxypentane (AOP)-RANTES on the activation of the CC chemokine receptor 3, CCR3, exemplary on human eosinophils, because they represent the dominant CCR3+ cell type. AOP-RANTES dose-dependently induced an increase of intracellular calcium concentration ([Ca(2+)](i)) and a release of reactive oxygen species, which could be inhibited by pertussis toxin, in human eosinophils from normal nonatopic donors. AOP-RANTES was as effective as RANTES but less effective than eotaxin and eotaxin-2 in the activation of the respiratory burst. Flow-cytometric analyses revealed that eosinophils constitutively expressed the CC chemokine receptors CCR1 and CCR3, whereas CCR5 was not expressed. AOP-RANTES, RANTES, eotaxin and eotaxin-2, but not Met-RANTES, induced a downregulation of CCR3 at 37 degrees C. Reexpression of CCR3 on eosinophils was observed within 120 min. Whereas no differences of CCR3 downregulation and recycling after stimulation with AOP-RANTES, RANTES, eotaxin and eotaxin-2 were found there exists a distinct profile of activity with respect to the activation of the respiratory burst in human eosinophils.

Detection of mRNA for eotaxin-2 and eotaxin-3 in human dermal fibroblasts and their distinct activation profile on human eosinophils.

As many new biologically active chemokines have been cloned exploring the genomic DNA sequence database in the vicinity of already known chemokine sequences without demonstrating their natural origin, it is important to transfer findings from in vitro experiments with chemokines into the in vivo situation. With respect to eosinophils and fibroblasts that play an important part in the pathogenesis of allergic and autoimmune diseases, the role of the recently discovered members of the eotaxin family, eotaxin-2 and eotaxin-3, is not really understood. In order to elucidate the origin and biologic potency of the eotaxin family this study was performed. Conventional reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction analysis was suitable to detect mRNA for eotaxin and eotaxin-3 but not for eotaxin-2 in dermal fibroblasts. In contrast to conventional reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, LightCycler analysis revealed that dermal fibroblasts constitutively expressed mRNA not only for eotaxin and eotaxin-3 but also for eotaxin-2. Moreover, with this technique we investigated mRNA expression levels after stimulation of fibroblasts with interleukin-4 and interleukin-4 plus tumor necrosis factor-alpha: the rank order of expression levels within the eotaxin family was eotaxin > eotaxin-3 > eotaxin-2. To address the question of the efficacy of eotaxin-3, we compared its activity with eotaxin, eotaxin-2, monocyte chemotactic protein-3, monocyte chemotactic protein-4, and RANTES in different test systems for eosinophils. The efficacy of the CC chemokines at equimolar concentrations with respect to the chemotactic response of human eosinophils was eotaxin-3 = eotaxin = eotaxin-2 > RANTES > monocyte chemotactic protein-4. The rank order of activity with respect to actin polymerization and release of toxic reactive oxygen species was eotaxin-3 = eotaxin = eotaxin-2 and eotaxin = eotaxin-2 > eotaxin-3 = monocyte chemotactic protein-3 = monocyte chemotactic protein-4 = RANTES, respectively. This study indicated a distinct profile in expression levels of the members of the eotaxin family in dermal fibroblasts. Indeed, all three eotaxin ligands demonstrated activation of human eosinophils with similar efficacies for chemotaxis, cytoskeletal rearrangements, activation of Gi proteins and transients of [Ca2+]i, but a distinct profile of activity with respect to the binding to CCR3 and the release of toxic reactive oxygen species. These findings may help to understand further the role of CC chemokines in fibroblast/eosinophil activation, which is of interest particularly in allergic and autoimmune diseases.

Characterization of the CC chemokine receptor 3 on human keratinocytes.

CC chemokine receptors are expressed on hematopoietic cells, and these may impart selective homing of monocyte, leukocyte, and lymphocyte subsets to sites of inflammation. CC chemokine receptor 3 is the major receptor on eosinophils and is also expressed on other inflammatory cells suggesting its important role for allergic diseases such as atopic dermatitis and bronchial asthma. Eotaxin, eotaxin-2 and eotaxin-3 have been identified as ligands that only activate CC chemokine receptor 3. CC chemokine receptor 3 is also activated by other promiscuous ligands, however, such as RANTES and monocyte chemotactic protein 4. To date, CC chemokine receptor 3 has not been reported to be expressed on nonhematopoietic cells. In this study, we investigated whether keratinocytes possess autocrine and paracrine mechanisms for CC chemokine secretion and receptor expression as reported for the expression of interleukin 8 and its receptors. Reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction analysis demonstrated that CC chemokine receptor 3 mRNA is expressed constitutively in cultured keratinocytes. The signal quantities of the CC chemokine receptor 3 amplicons showed lower intensities for keratinocytes than for eosinophils. In situ hybridization techniques exhibited that basal cell layers of the epidermis were stained homogeneously for CC chemokine receptor 3 mRNA with a decreasing signal to the upper epidermis showing that differentiating and proliferating keratinocytes did express mRNA specific for CC chemokine receptor 3. Immunohistochemical studies confirmed low expression of CC chemokine receptor 3 protein on epidermal keratinocytes compared to the high level observed on infiltrating eosinophils. Furthermore, stimulation of cultured keratinocytes with eotaxin resulted in an increased [3H]thymidine incorporation indicating a role of CC chemokine receptor 3 in epidermal proliferation and differentiation. These data demonstrate that CC chemokine receptor 3 is expressed not only on hematopoietic cells but also on keratinocytes as nonhematopoietic cells with ectodermal origin. Therefore, the identification of CC chemokine receptor 3 on epidermal keratinocytes may indicate a role for CC chemokine receptor 3 and its ligands in skin physiology and pathophysiology.

The CC chemokine receptor 3 CCR3 is functionally expressed on eosinophils but not on neutrophils.

The chemokine subclasses differ in their biological activity to stimulate different kinds of effector cells via distinct chemokine receptors. Controversial results about the expression of the CC chemokine receptor CCR3 on the surface of human neutrophils have been described. To find out whether eosinophil contamination might be responsible for these diverse observations, CCR3 expression on highly purified neutrophils and eosinophils was investigated. We enriched neutrophils from a heterogeneous granulocyte population with immunomagnetic beads coated with various anti-CD52 monoclonal antibodies. This procedure was suitable to enrich neutrophils with a purity of up to 99.85%. Reverse transcriptase-PCR revealed that CCR3 mRNA was not expressed by CD52-negative selected neutrophils. In contrast to these cells, CCR3 mRNA could be detected in a heterogeneous granulocyte population and CD16-negative selected eosinophils. In addition, spectrofluorometric measurement of intracellular calcium concentration ([Ca2+]i) demonstrated that CD52-negative selected neutrophils did not show a transient [Ca2+]i increase following stimulation with the CCR3 ligand eotaxin, whereas the heterogeneous granulocyte population as well as eosinophils did respond. Therefore, previous studies demonstrating the expression of CCR3 on human neutrophils have to be re-evaluated because CCR3 mRNA detection on human neutrophils due to contamination by mRNA from eosinophils could not be excluded.

Differential activation of CC chemokine receptors by AOP-RANTES.

RANTES (regulated on activation normal T cell expressed) has been found at elevated levels in biological fluids from patients with a wide range of allergic and autoimmune diseases and is able to attract several subtypes of leukocytes including eosinophils and monocytes into inflamed tissue. Amino-terminal modifications of RANTES produce receptor antagonists which are candidates for blocking this cellular recruitment. Met-RANTES has been shown to modulate inflammation in vivo, while AOP-RANTES is a potent inhibitor of R5 human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) strains and has been shown to down-modulate CCR5 and prevent recycling of the receptor. We have studied the effect of AOP-RANTES in eosinophil activation and have found that it is able to efficiently elicit eosinophil effector functions through CCR3, as measured by the release of reactive oxygen species and calcium mobilization, whereas Met-RANTES is inactive in these assays. AOP-RANTES is found to inhibit CCR3-mediated HIV-1 infection with moderate potency, in contrast to its potent inhibition of CCR5-mediated HIV-1 infection. Furthermore, we have investigated the abilities of these modified proteins to down-modulate CCR1 and CCR3 from the surface of monocytes and eosinophils. We show here that AOP-RANTES is much less effective than RANTES in down-modulation of CCR1. Surprisingly, recycling of CCR1 was minimal after incubation with RANTES while there was complete recycling with AOP-RANTES. In the case of CCR3, no significant difference was found between RANTES and AOP-RANTES in down-modulation and recycling. It therefore appears that trafficking of RANTES receptors follows different patterns, which opens up potential new targets for therapeutic intervention.

Characterization of synthetic C3a analog peptides on human eosinophils in comparison to the native complement component C3a.

The C3a anaphylatoxin is a potent proinflammatory mediator derived from the complement system inducing biologic effects of human eosinophils like Ca2+ transients and the activation of the respiratory burst. These findings support an important role for C3a in diseases typically associated with a peripheral blood or tissue eosinophilia. Synthetic human C3a analogue peptides with variations at the C-terminal effector domain have been evaluated with respect to their binding affinity and signaling potency on human eosinophils. Flow cytometrical analysis and RT-PCR revealed that the C3a receptor is constitutively expressed on human eosinophils. Peptides bearing an N-terminal 9-fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl and the 6-aminohexanoyl motif were the most powerful peptides tested. Amino acid replacements in the conserved C-terminal pentapeptide decreased binding affinity and functional potency substantially. In addition, synthetic C3a analogue peptides induced C3aR internalization, led to transient changes of intracellular Ca2+ concentration, and did release reactive oxygen species in human eosinophils indicating the in vivo relevance of C3a-related sequences. The tripeptide LAR was found to be essential for C3a receptor binding on human eosinophils. Moreover, the putative binding motif of C3a anaphylatoxin is also crucial for the induction of biologic effects in the human system such as changes of intracellular Ca2+ concentration and the release of reactive oxygen species. This study demonstrates that the carboxyl terminus is important for the interaction with the C3aR and the biologic potency of C3a anaphylatoxin in the human system and plays a key role in the activation process of human eosinophils.